people that like fascistism

The Expropriation of my property has ruined my life.

Go to my blog site and see for your self what went on, document that was not disclose until in court on March 2005,

My owned lawyers entering the documents,

The Evidence was tacking out the applicant's evidence ,one day before trial and so on.

There was a total conflict of Interest on all of the Law firm files on this new highway deal. See http://www.govinjustice.blogspot.com

I know my spelling is bad, but I think you will get the just of what up. I have been Abuse by the system? These Judges, lawyers, law society, and so on.

Would you know how I could get my Expropriation Investigation done on all the Issues of the Law?

Abuse means mistreating another person. It can take any of the Following forms, many of which are Criminal in nature.

The $212,000.00 lawyer bill. Is Criminal in nature to the taxpayer of New Brunswick in it self, to put a man on welfare,

the delay of 11 years out of a person life, deepockeing a person from February 12,1997 and so on, there can’t be know relief for me.

I know, I am to old to start over, now?

Why would I want too knowing what is going on in the system, go see and lesson to audio files. Court trial.

http:govinjustice.blogspot.com ,there a lot more will be on this site, stay tune

[51] I accept Ms. Pugh’s evidence as being factual. I conclude Mr. Harris did meet with Heather Pugh on the date mentioned in the memo and that he knew on that date not only were the two front lots going to be affected but some of the parent lot including the access between lots 92-1 and 92-2. Supporting this conclusion is a portion of the Statement of Claim in an action Mr. Harris has commenced against an appraiser initially retained to value the subject lands. The Statement of Claim was prepared by Mr. Harris. Paragraph 3 says (see: Exhibit R-1, Tab 11):

On or about December 20, 1996, the Plaintiff received, by registered mail, an Intent to Survey Notice dated, December 12, 1996. Receipt of this letter cause (sic) the Plaintiff to cease his plans of further self-employment and land development, because of the intention of the Minister of Transportation to relocate a highway and expropriate land from the Plaintiffs. (page 4, paragraph 3)

[52] Mr. Harris acknowledged the two concepts were submitted by his engineers with his knowledge.

? if the engineers put the two concepts in on January 20/1997? How could I have knowledge if I didn’t pay him until January 21/1997. I think Judge Russell Decision was made in my case on January 3, 1997 when I call the engineers, why ? because he did lay out work for the Government, when the highway was to be in a different location. (smith Subdivision) This is the reason that Heather Pugh had to lie,!! Heather Pugh , God know, and every one you work with know.