CRIMINAL IN NATURE

people that like Fascist's

The Expropriation of my property has ruined my life.

Go to my blog site and see for your self what went on, document that was not disclose until in court on March 2005,

lesson to trial audio of what was said by Judge Russell?

My owned lawyers entering the documents,that are not on the Affidavit of documents list? of the Government.

There was Evidence tacking out By the applicant's Lawyers ,one day before trial and so on? date February 28/2005 ? the Applicant will not know until March 5/2005? the Applicant respond with a letter to his LAWYERS with a letter dated March 5,2005.

There was a total conflict of Interest on all of the Law firm files on this new highway deal.

See http://www.govinjustice.blogspot.com ?

I know my spelling is bad, but I think you will get the just of what up.

I have been Abuse by the system?

These Judges, lawyers, law society, and so on.

Would you know how I could get an Investigation done.

Expropriation Investigation done on all the Issues of the Law?

Abuse means mistreating another person. It can take any of the Following forms, many of which are Criminal in nature.

The $212,000.00 lawyer bill. Is Criminal in nature to the taxpayer of New Brunswick in it self,

to put a man on welfare? Why was I Mistreated .

Delay 11 years out of a person life, deep Pockeing a person from February 12,1997 and so on, there can’t be know relief for me now?

I know, I am to old to start over ? BEST YEARS ARE GONG ?

Why would I want too knowing what is going on in the system, go see and lesson to audio files. Court trial.

http:govinjustice.blogspot.com ,there a lot more Evidence will be on this site, stay tune

the paragraph below is from Judge Russell
Decision of June 3,2005.

The Factual Evidence of Ms.Pugh's is Perjury?

Now in 2006, I let Minister Denis Landry know of the Perjury and the Fraud that went on?

He know about Goodwin page (90) in the Draft

report of a man that knew what was to take place in Court back in 1999?

in other words a Stage Trial for 2005 ?

[51] I accept Ms. Pugh’s evidence as being factual. I conclude Mr. Harris did meet with Heather Pugh on the date mentioned in the memo and that he knew on that date not only were the two front lots going to be affected but some of the parent lot including the access between lots 92-1 and 92-2. Supporting this conclusion is a portion of the Statement of Claim in an action Mr. Harris has commenced against an appraiser initially retained to value the subject lands. The Statement of Claim was prepared by Mr. Harris. Paragraph 3 says (see: Exhibit R-1, Tab 11):

On or about December 20, 1996, the Plaintiff received, by registered mail, an Intent to Survey Notice dated, December 12, 1996. Receipt of this letter cause (sic) the Plaintiff to cease his plans of further self-employment and land development, because of the intention of the Minister of Transportation to relocate a highway and expropriate land from the Plaintiffs. (page 4, paragraph 3)

[52] Mr. Harris acknowledged the two concepts were submitted by his engineers with his knowledge.

? if the engineers put the two concepts in on January 20/1997?

How could I have knowledge if I did not pay him until January 21/1997.

I think Judge Russell Decision was made in my case on January 3, 1997 when I call the engineers, why ?

because he did lay out work for the Government, when the highway was to be in a different location. (smith Subdivision)

This is the reason that Heather Pugh had to lie,!! Heather Pugh , God know, and every one you work with know.