Survey work done is key

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

T.J.burke blog site?

people that like fascistism

The Expropriation of my property has ruined my life.

Go to my blog site and see for yourself what went on?

Documents that was not disclose until in court on March 2005,

My owned lawyers entered the documents.

There was Evidence tracking out the applicant's evidence ,one day before trial and so on.

The Evidence was that i did not meet Heather Pugh until after February 12,1997.

There was a total conflict of Interest on all of the Law firm files on this new highway deal. See http://www.govinjustice.blogspot.com

( we the people that loss property from Fredericton to Moncton should start a class Action

I know my spelling is bad, but I think you will get the just of what up.

I have been abuse by the system.

These Judges, lawyers, law society, and so on.

Would you know how I could get my Expropriation Investigation done on all the Issues of the Law?

Abuse means mistreating another person.

It can take any of the following forms, many of which are Criminal in nature.

The $212,000.00 lawyer bill is Criminal in nature to the taxpayer of New Brunswick in itself, to put a man on welfare,

The delay of 11 years out of a person life, deepockering a person from February 12,1997 and so on,

there canʼt be any relief for me Now.

I know, I am to old to start over now?

what am i to do?

My site have a lot of info -

http:govinjustice.blogspot.com

You can go to http://canlii.org and see the Government Know what they are doing to people?

[51] I accept Ms. Pughʼs evidence as being factual. I conclude Mr. Harris did meet with Heather Pugh on the date mentioned in the memo and that he knew on that date not only were the two front lots going to be affected but some of the parent lot including the access between lots 92-1 and 92-2. Supporting this conclusion is a portion of the Statement of Claim in an action Mr. Harris has commenced against an appraiser initially retained to value the subject lands. The Statement of Claim was prepared by Mr. Harris. Paragraph 3 says (see: Exhibit R-1, Tab 11):

On or about December 20, 1996, the Plaintiff received, by registered mail, an Intent to Survey Notice dated, December 12, 1996. Receipt of this letter cause (sic) the Plaintiff to cease his plans of further self-employment and land development, because of the intention of the Minister of Transportation to relocate a highway and expropriate land from the Plaintiffs. (page 4, paragraph 3) ?

Now think about this one?

on or about May 11, 1997 . I Richard call up D.O.T. and told then that i was going to start building my new home on my best lot.?

They replied was if i did any work on my property after the date i sign for the Intent to Survey Notice?

I would not be paid for any improvement after that date.

So would you not think that was the date the stop work was place on my property?

[52] Mr. Harris acknowledged the two concepts were submitted by his engineers with his knowledge.

If the engineers put the two concepts in on January 20/1997?

How could I have knowledge if I didnʼt pay him until January 21/1997?

I think Judge Russell's decision was made in my case on January 3, 1997 when I call the engineers?

Why ?

Because he did lay out work for the Government, when the highway was to be in a different location. (Smith Subdivision) This is the reason that Heather Pugh had to lie!!

Heather Pugh, God know, and everyone you work with know.

Is there any one that could tell me and get the evidence to me.

That there was no Survey work done until after December 17,1996?

? why would they send out letter ( Intent to Survey Notice) ? when was this work done?

What i found out ? it was March 7, 1997? so how could say what he did in Par graft 51?

Where did the memo come From ? there was no Discloser on it? when was if made up?

Why would my lawyers aloud this? and why would they enter it in to the Court?

was my case not cut-and -dry before i got to Court on March 2005?