Calling all Expropriation Victims to start a coalition.

ItÂ’s near Christmas for therefore IÂ’m not going to go on a tirade of the many reasons weÂ’re protesting a Elimination of the New Brunswick Human Rights Day on Janua24th4th in front of the main office on Brunswick Street. I will say that the Commission hasnÂ’t held a tribunal in years compare to Nova Scotia that hold over 10 tribunals per year.The Commission is a total disgrace in New Brunswick. They held a Canadian Human Rights Conference last June but we didnÂ’t protest this little shameful meeting. These appointed individuals do not care for human rights in this Province and must be Investigation The final straw was when they came out with their annual report last week. They never mentioned the issue of the poor. They had more complaints than the year before but no tribunals hearings. The question is why? Is someone being paid to back off? In my case? Well? I have been fighting with these people for the last 7 years. Just go to the top of this blog to search this blog-New Brunswick Human Rights Commission.ThereÂ’s all kinds of information in there. Enjoy!IÂ’ll go more into the details in the new year. This is going to get really dirty. I tried to talk to the Commission but to no avail.They believe that New Brunswickers rights should be ignored.Stay tuned
well here a new one ( The Right to have Justice)(The Right to have a fair Trial and a Fair unbias Decision Made, on June 3-2005, Before Mr.Justice David H.Russell
The Right to Get Information and evidence of perjury ,that there was lying under oath by the following people
Heather .Pugh ,John Raymond,of the Department of Trasportation.Now look at these person salary (over $130,000.thousand a Year) Look at there Salvation,?to retire,with regular pay.

Now look at this Letter from the Ombudsman ,that I received December 26/06

Date of December 18,2006, Quote, Conversation with Christian Whalen last week,

? told him about letter of Mr.David Eidt-Office of Attorney General

Look at Minister Denis Landry Letter to Richard A. Harris dated November 28,2006 Now he notes that there two Subject Harris V. Her Majesty the Queen,

DOT:Court File F/C/328/00;now this Case Decision of David Russell came down June 3,2005 . The Right to Information was for the Court of Appeal of New,Brunswick File: No.100/05/CA.

Now look at letter of David Eidt,to Mr.Harris Dated December 13,2006 on Pargrafh

four. Quote, The Department of Transportation therefore will not be answering any of the Questions appearing in your letter or in your fax cover sheet in response to right to information request. ? why will DOT not Answer ! Because,if they Answer one way it will show Perjury. If they Answer the other way ,it will show that they Deliberatery set out to dely and finances ruin Richard Harris.

The Evidence is that they knew my attendant self Enployment with the Land.

Now back to Right, Constitution Rights Under the heading "Mobility Rights " (a)

To move to and take up residence in any Province:;and

(B) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.

The right to have the Ombudsman of NB, See To Right to Information Act,C,R-10.3

Not to let The DOT Government Minister Denis Landry Past the buck to David Eidt

That will keep on Delaying the matter of not being able to Move out to Alberta

where I can be with my Family, and rebuild what life i have left.

I belived i went to the Ombudsman to get Answer, and belived this is there

responsibility of there position.? or are they a Government delaying Tactic.














Fmr B.C. lobbyist to seek adjournment at law society hearing
By GREG JOYCE


VANCOUVER (CP) - Counsel for the Law Society of Upper Canada and former B.C. lobbyist Eric Bornmann will make a joint submission Tuesday that his scheduled 'good character' hearing be adjourned.
The hearing for Bornmann, who has completed his law article in Toronto and wants to practise law in Ontario, was scheduled to be heard Tuesday in Toronto.
Bornmann is alleged to have paid almost $30,000 to three B.C. government officials in exchange for government information and is a key witness at an upcoming trial that flows from a raid on the B.C. legislature.
Instead of a full hearing to determine whether he is fit to be allowed to practise law, a law society spokeswoman said both sides had agreed to seek an adjournment.
Lawyers will inform the hearing panel when they want the hearing to reconvene - if the adjournment is granted - but the law society is on record as saying it wants the hearing adjourned until after Bornmann testifies at a trial starting in Vancouver next month.
A police raid on the B.C. legislature in December 2003 resulted in charges against three former government employees. ? (NB. employees Knew about NS, Lawyer and H .W. Goodwin as John Raymond was in Court on the McLeod V. NB.;[2000]NBR(2d)supp.)No.112(TD) NOW? Look at

His Letter to the LAW SOCIETY in 1998, setting the Stage,for protection,of the Government

Sponsorship of NS lawyers and NB appraisaler of giving taxpayer money away to MRDC owen

LAW Firm Patterson,Palmer,Hunt,Murphy, (where Government could Victimize a person out

of His Hole Life Work, by using legual Tacties, ( such as Rules of Court,Rules of Civil procedure,

Limitation of time to a action in Court, The Expropriation Act,Date for Filing Post-Trial Briefs:

that the Applicants will not see till after sent to Judge, The Pleading,and so on.Like a Motions Court recoarding being discoury, Evidence that Lawyers Deliveley delay the Matters, and so on.

Dave Basi, a former aide to then-finance minister Gary Collins, and Robert Virk, who worked for former transport minister Judith Reid, both faces charges of fraud, breach of trust and influence peddling.
Last April, several court documents were released on the case including four separate applications by the RCMP in 2004 to obtain search warrants.
In one application, the Crown contends Dave Basi accepted a benefit from Bornmann and committed a breach of trust. (My , Lawyers entering Meno of Heather Pugh as a Applicants

Exhibit. when they knew there was on Meeting with her on the 17 day of December 1996 . That application alleges that Bornmann "received information and documents from Dave Basi in exchange for payments which were made to Aneal Basi for forwarding to Dave Basi."
Another application alleges that Dave Basi received the money from Bornmann in return for Basi's referring clients to him and assisting him with "matters of government."
Aneal Basi was a public affairs officer in the Transport Ministry.
The warrants allege that Aneal Basi passed funds from Bornmann to Dave Basi.
"These funds were in the form of cheques written to Aneal Basi, deposited to the account of Aneal Basi, and it is believed, disbursed to David Basi as part of the arrangement with Erik Bornmann," the court documents allege.
None of the allegations against them have been proven in court.
On the law society's website, the society says it would seek the adjournment until after Bornmann testifies, or the criminal matter is withdrawn or the trial is concluded.
Counsel for Bornmann, prior to the joint motion, were going to propose a motion at his hearing that it be held behind closed doors, or that a publication ban be ordered until the Vancouver trial is completed.
A summary of some search warrant information had already been released before the RCMP applications

Do you see what is going on Behind closed doors in the two Action on my matters.