To the LAW SOCIETY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, WHO WILL LOOK AT THIS MATTER,.?????????????????????????
February 16,2007
To David D. Eidt, Esq. Richard Harris Office of the Attorney General 721
Room 444,
E3B-5H1
Dear Mr. David Eidt,Esq.
On February 12, 2007 when we were in Court on the matter of the Appeal on court file, NO; F/C/328/00
I showed you a letter that I received, from the Law Society of New Brunswick,
A letter to Jamie Eddy, from Robert Pineo, where he is updating him, Mr Eddy, on my Expropriation Case files. ? (No; F/C/328/00), am I not right here.
As I don’t think they are respecting me on the Goodwin matter Court file:.
That was put on me because of an Expropriation Matter. That the Government Employee knew willy-nilly, that, they would be putting a stop to my self Employment on February 12, 1997.
In 1997 under a Lawyer Frank McKinnon Liberal Government, Who would Obvious know the rules of Court, and the Circumstance of this Law firm, being Atlantic wide law firm, could be Occasion with N.S. lawyer. That could occur a happening in Expropriation of property for obviously and be staying in the law.
The Government could give larges amount of Money to there set up Contractor Compety. MRDC. And the Compety Law Firm Patterson Palmer Hunt Murphy.
If they ran in to any difficult Property owner, they would give up by being bully around.
· Now a lawyer from N.S. With some little propaganda insight on the public about this N.S. lawyer of being one of the best Experts Lawyer in Expropriation of 400 cases or so,
The Lawyer Caldwell was also setting up meeting with people that would be or may be losing Property. (This is how people was getting hook up with the N.S.Lawyer.)?
MRDC or DOT, must have been Giving the name of property owner to the N.S.Lawyers,
I think if there was an investigation on this matter you will find out this lawyer has approxley 70% of the N.B. Expropriation cases.
Mr. Caldwell was telling people at meeting that under the Expropriation Act. The Act, will pay all legal and expert’s costs. (Lawyer
The Retainer Agreement of two page, that more or less stating the fees and Costs will be the responsibility of the Provincial Government, whether the Billings are forwarded directly to the Client or through Patterson Palmer Hunt Murphy.
On the Second page of the retainer agreements where the party would sign. It will say?
Should you have any questions regarding our representation of your Intersts, at any time, do not hesitate to contact us.
The Clients will unlikely get any letters from the
By the time most Property Owner would have found out, that there could be a poetical conflict of interest. Property owner would all ready owe money to the N.S. Lawyer. (Look at there Bill of costs from October 31/97 to January 15, 1998.)
But what even more importance the Date on the Retainer Agreement of January 19/98 the day this Nova Scotia Lawyer knew for sure I was Changing Lawyer.
But what is really more important is testimony of the Appraiser Malcolm Carter in court on March of 2005, he said that he turn a subdivision Development approach
Report to vale in to D.O.T. on January, 23, 1998. Also said he did not know why he did this for because he doesn’t know how to do a subdivision approach to vale.
A investigation or inquire would more then likely show that the Government set the stage for the lands taking in 1995, when they incorporated on January 1,1995 ,when the province of New Brunswick’s Legislative Assembly passed bill 17,Chapter 108 of provincial legislation; the Act to incorporate the New Brunswick Association of Real Estate Appraisers.
What did this do? It put all the N.B. Appraisers in an organized group, a gang, a group to intimidate Property owner.
The Government gives out about or controls about 90% of all work for Appraisers.
Now look at one of the top Appraisers of D.O.T. of the N.B. Appraisers gang ,Yes it is John S Raymond .He not can only intimidate Property owner but also can intimidate the Appraisers in the Association of Real Estate Appraisers, (if they want Government Work.)
Now the way the legal system is set up by all Lawyers, If you need to changes lawyer you will have to paid the first Lawyer off, before another lawyer will take over your file.( the lawyers Association is the LAW SOCIETY ,the Problem is that there a Law Society for each Province,) more Government Tactic in the law,
The Logic here is the public don’t know that in N.B. you should hirer a NB Lawyer until you get in a Matter like that was put on my self. (I would not know any of this till 1999. But I think I was asking question to the Government in the summer of 1998. About the Conflict of Interest between MRDC, Lawyers and the Government.
Why I am saying this is because in August of 2001, and had time to look over the Government documents that was on John S Raymond Affidavit list that I received in October of 2000.
I discover he was writing letter to the Law Society of New Brunswick. See attachment. To the N.B. Law Society, July 17, 1998 Dear Mr. Carrier. From planning and Land Management Sincerely John S. Raymond [Assistant Director]
He said in letter. I enclose a copy of a letter, dated May 28, 1998, from Mr. Douglas A. Caldwell (Solicitor with Patterson Palmer Hunt Murphy) to the Hon. Sheldon Lee, Minister of Transportation.
Mr. Caldwell advised that he is legal Council to H.A.R. Construction, and to Richard and Marilyn Harris, Oromocto, N.B.
Now right here it not like John S.Raymond doesn’t know about Mr. Caldwell doing Expropriation files in NB. Look at this Attachment (M/M/206/96) the McLeod V. N.B. What real funny here is that Mr. Raymond was not only getting letter from Mr. Caldwell, he was also receiving loots of Letter from my New Brunswick Lawyer John B.D. Logan. Was Raymond Writing? Letter to the Law Society also on the McLeod case .or was this Letter have soon ting to do with the Pleading of May 28, 1998, or Because of what Richard turn in on February 24, 1998. That end up as an exhibit, NO; 14 from Discovery of 2001.
My case would be some what different .I would first hire a N.B. lawyer, Allen Miles. Because where I loss my planed self Employments, knowing this for sure on or about February 12,1997 and was forced under the circumstances to make a life change. End up Obtaining Employment out side of N.B. [forced to get a Lawyer]
On or about June 3, 1997 I would hire Allen Miles to look after my interest while I was out West Working and looking a round to see if I would be better of moving there.
To Day is Monday 19, 2007 and I won’t have any more time to work on this Letter.
Because I just faxed a Six Pages Motion to Mr. Goodwin Lawyer. Hugh J. Cameron and not 25mim past and there was a S.A.Deliveries agent at my door, giving me a sign for Letter. Attachment Stewart McKinley Re; Court File No; F/C/187/04.
But I will say this, before the trial in March of 2005; I would fax a copy of the Action of Goodwin to Robert Pineo and Caldwell, instructing the Lawyers to enter this as a tab on the applicant’s Exhibit book list. (Fact this ended up on the respondent Exhibit book in trial)
I fax this Action on Mr. Goodwin and along also a 13 pages Back ground report that I prepare for the Lawyer.
My now ex lawyers or the lawyers that I did not have fighting for my Company or self at the Trial in March of 2005. I told Lawyers Mr.Pineo, Mr.Eddy, and Mr. Caldwell that I requested the Goodwin Action that was served on Him in June of 2004 be entered by my Law firm lawyers. That now there a motion on this file number F/C/187/04 set to be heard on February 26/07 ? I should have had my files back by now. Is it only Circumstances that there was a Status hearing on February 12/07 and now there a motion hearing set for the 26/07 as well.
So I am presuming that Jamie Eddy is or was my New Brunswick Lawyer. If Robert Pineo, sending out Letter to Mr. Eddy? I guest I must be right. I have you to know that on August 29, 2005. I took a heart attach and ended up having Heart Snuggery, now I was not aloud to do any thing till the end of December of 2005, I also would have to move in December of 2005, do to the Circumstances. As I was telling my room house land lord that I would be moving out west, before I took the Heart attract. To be closer to my grand daughter and daughter Aimee. I had no attachment of taking the money of Judge Russell Decision of June 3, 2005. Till I found out what I would be getting back on my costs and out of pocket expenses. This time in November of 2005, I was being forced to changes my mind .do to the stress of Snuggery with no driver lesson and my land lady all ready had my room rented out for the month of December. To a person that would be there for two years .I was now being forced to try to get the Money, I was very distress and unhappy that under the circumstances I found my self in that I would have to seek money from Russell Decision.
Now in order to get payment from the Lawyers, they were telling me that I would have to signs paper for then, to give to the Government. Before they would send the money from N.S. At first they sent out the paper an advice me to sign and return then to there Office in N.S., before I would see the Cheque. I inform then that I would not be signing any paper for then on less the money was to be release to me the same time. This took about two weeks to come about. (I did not think they would give up the Money.)
On or about November 2/05 my NB lawyer Jamie Eddy had a call put to me telling me that they have a Cheque for us my son and my self.
On or about November 4, 2005 we would go to the
See 9 pages of Attachment:
Now there was also a letter to your Attention: Mr. David Eidt that was already in advance of our Meeting with Mr. Eddy, as you can see by the letter head on this Letter to you the law Firm that represents us was Patterson Palmer law, and the lawyer in NB was at this time, was Jamie Eddy, that would have us sign these paper of Release. (It was Not Douglas Caldwell or Robert Pineo.)
This brings us to the Question if they had no intention to put in Documents of Cost for Payment of Costs and Disbursements, to be assessed by the court if necessary.
Then my files should of have been return on this day of November 4 by Mr. Eddy.
Now there the matter of the appeal .Now Mr. Eddy being our N.B. lawyer know dam well if his Clint, in the case of Richard A. Harris ,the results of the appeal initiated by him in the Court of Appeal. (He would need his files as quickly as possible)
On or about September 14, 2006, I made a request to Patterson Palmer Hunt Murphy
Or Patterson Palmer Law, Firm. Requesting my total files as to the letter to Jamie Eddy (see letters to
See Attachment of nine pages of release Document of November 4/05
See Attachment of Letter. September 14, 2006.
Robert Pineo is talking about two Issues in this Email letter to Jamie C.Eddy.
The first Issue is the Taxation of there bill of Costs only. I have you to know
That I don’t except this as being Legal, as you are well aware that I am, entitled as being the owner ‘’ costs’’ as well.
I will need at least three month to do this taste once I have my file return to my self.
Robert Pineo not only provided a bill of costs ,he also provided you Mr.Eidt a Affidavit in March on 2006 that I was not aware of, on till I received this letter from the Law Society. He is saying this is his Affidavit, is it not a law under the Expropriation Act (o.c.84-46) accordingly to this case.
Now Mr.Eidt I have informed you a number of times about this Court File: File No.: M/M/206/96
McLeod V.
Mr. Eidt do you know what the word cul-de-sac mean (a dead end street) after my gravel pit was sold A cul-de-sac was a dead end JOB.
There were all most the same circumstances going on, the different is in Court the Government knew that there side, and did not have any Appraisal reports, with Mr. Carter as there appraiser. So my Lawyer would enter his reports,??
But what became more importance at this time is the Goodwin Matter of the up coming motion set for February 26,2007 that Robert Pineo not only provided a bill of costs ,he also provided you Mr.Eidt a Affidavit in March on 2006,that I was not aware of, on till I received this latter from the Law Society.
Now you said to me in Court on February, 12, 2007 that you would give me a copy of this Affidavit. I would like a copy before February 22, 2007 as more then likely
I will need it on this Motion of the 26, day of February 2007.
I would like to bring this to your attention that the Goodwin Action would have not come to be if I was not in this land disputed. Now at Discovery of September 11, 2001 Mr. Caldwell said he would be Entering the Goodwin Bill to the Government as well. I don’t be lived this has been done. So I will be entering his costs along with mine as soon as I get my file back. Plus all the rest of my never ending costs that go on daily. Do to all matter of the loss of my self Employments.
This loss started on or about February 12, 1997. As of to day February, 19, /07 this is over 10 years of out right delved abuse to a person. This time faring of Delay is Abuse in it self.
Robert Pineo said in this Attachment Email of October 25, 2006 that I presume him talking about you? Counsel has agreed not to pursue the taxation until such time as the Court delivers its decisions on four pending taxations.
Am I aloud to know who these people are, as it looks like they also had a lot difficulty?
Now Mr.Pineo go on to say that one of these cases is Factually similar to the Harris case, and on a Decision to act as Precedent. Well I hope that there was no Successful Negotiations on there bill yet. As I have not even got my files back.
I think fore sure I would have the Right to know who this person is, that you know my ex lawyers are justifying there $212,359.86 bill of Costs on this File.
Mr. Pineo said the Second Issue is the return of the file to Mr. Harris.
Here a Question that I would like you to answer why is he tacking on an undertaken to Vet my File before returning it to the Client or to my self. Do you not know that there are soon tings rung here?
Well on the 26, day of February 2007 Robert Pineo now has been at vetting my Files for over four Months now. Maybe this got a lot to do with the Goodwin matter that flowed from these four parcels of property being expropriated.
Three parcels, there would not even be mark able in size and shapes.
It is 5pm and I got to try to get ready for the Motion,
Your truly ___________________ _____________________
Richard Harris. February 19,2007.
TEXTAREA_ID
No comments:
Post a Comment