On or about September 14, 2006, I made a request to Patterson Palmer Hunt Murphy
Or Patterson Palmer Law, Firm. Requesting my total files as to the letter to Jamie Eddy (see letters to
See Attachment of nine pages of release Document of November 4/05
See Attachment of Letter. September 14, 2006.
Robert Pineo is talking about two Issues in this Email letter to Jamie C.Eddy.
The first Issue is the Taxation of there bill of Costs only. I have you to know
That I don’t except this as being Legal, as you are well aware that I am, entitled as being the owner ‘’ costs’’ as well.
I will need at least three month to do this taste once I have my file return to my self.
Robert Pineo not only provided a bill of costs ,he also provided you Mr.Eidt a Affidavit in March on 2006 that I was not aware of, on till I received this letter from the Law Society. He is saying this is his Affidavit, is it not a law under the Expropriation Act (o.c.84-46) accordingly to this case.
Now Mr.Eidt I have informed you a number of times about this Court File: File No.: M/M/206/96
McLeod V.
Mr. Eidt do you know what the word cul-de-sac mean (a dead end street) after my gravel pit was sold A cul-de-sac was a dead end JOB.
There were all most the same circumstances going on, the different is in Court the Government knew that there side, and did not have any Appraisal reports, with Mr. Carter as there appraiser. So my Lawyer would enter his reports,??
But what became more importance at this time is the Goodwin Matter of the up coming motion set for February 26,2007 that Robert Pineo not only provided a bill of costs ,he also provided you Mr.Eidt a Affidavit in March on 2006,that I was not aware of, on till I received this latter from the Law Society.
Now you said to me in Court on February, 12, 2007 that you would give me a copy of this Affidavit. I would like a copy before February 22, 2007 as more then likely
I will need it on this Motion of the 26, day of February 2007.
I would like to bring this to your attention that the Goodwin Action would have not come to be if I was not in this land disputed. Now at Discovery of September 11, 2001 Mr. Caldwell said he would be Entering the Goodwin Bill to the Government as well. I don’t be lived this has been done. So I will be entering his costs along with mine as soon as I get my file back. Plus all the rest of my never ending costs that go on daily. Do to all matter of the loss of my self Employments.
This loss started on or about February 12, 1997. As of to day February, 19, /07 this is over 10 years of out right delved abuse to a person. This time faring of Delay is Abuse in it self.
Robert Pineo said in this Attachment Email of October 25, 2006 that I presume him talking about you? Counsel has agreed not to pursue the taxation until such time as the Court delivers its decisions on four pending taxations.
Am I aloud to know who these people are, as it looks like they also had a lot difficulty?
Now Mr.Pineo go on to say that one of these cases is Factually similar to the Harris case, and on a Decision to act as Precedent. Well I hope that there was no Successful Negotiations on there bill yet. As I have not even got my files back.
I think fore sure I would have the Right to know who this person is, that you know my ex lawyers are justifying there $212,359.86 bill of Costs on this File.
Mr. Pineo said the Second Issue is the return of the file to Mr. Harris.
Here a Question that I would like you to answer why is he tacking on an undertaken to Vet my File before returning it to the Client or to my self. Do you not know that there are soon tings rung here?
Well on the 26, day of February 2007 Robert Pineo now has been at vetting my Files for over four Months now. Maybe this got a lot to do with the Goodwin matter that flowed from these four parcels of property being expropriated.
Three parcels, there would not even be mark able in size and shapes.
It is 5pm and I got to try to get ready for the Motion,
Your truly ___________________ _____________________
TEXTAREA_ID
No comments:
Post a Comment