Expropriation the ACT ? WoW

________________________________________
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:25:41 -0700
From: oldmaison@yahoo.com
Subject: Your letter
To: injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
To Whom It May concern: Visit Length 31 minutes 53 secondsPage Views 16 Domain Name GNB.CA ? (Canada)IP Address 142.139.0.# (Province of New Brunswick)ISP Province of New BrunswickLocation
Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)

State/Region : New Brunswick
City : Fredericton
On November 27/2007 views buy the Government ?

The main key of evidence in the matter on the files of Goodwin and the Appeal of Russell¢s Decision of June 3rd, 2005 that I believe will turn the matter into deliberate, illegal abuse.

The main issue is the matter of Judge Russell¢s decision on page 19.paragrafh 49,50,51,52,

Now to get the consent of what was going on with my Lawyers, Goodwin, DOT employee¢s and so on?

We have to start when the Public would know for the first time the routing of the highway was to change location.

1. There was a Discovery on September 11th and 12th of 2001, Now John Raymond will take undertaking to provide additional information in relation to the Public Meetings (the public meeting was December 11/1996.)
2. Now at this public meeting there was a rough drawing with a date on it 12/96.
3. I saw this Drawing for the first time on or about after February 13/1997.
4. I did not meet Heather Pugh until after this date that for sure. ( if D.O.T. did not have any survey work done until late February, 1997. then how could there be a drawing with survey line like drawing 82 on December 17,1996?
5. So does this not mean that Heather Pugh lied on the stand? ( perjury) Why would she do this? (She testified that she was promoted in D.O.T.)??? (maybe this is why)
6. See December 6th, 2001 and December 5th, 2001 (?John Raymond undertakeing )that I will not know about till December 20th, 2002. ? Why did Lawyer Eddy and Caldwell hold this information from myself until December 20/2002. ?
But I got Mr. Carter files on May, 30/2002?? (part of Raymond undertaking ),(But I know now there were files left out!
He turned a subdivision approach to vale on January 23/1998 to D.O.T. that was not in the files ,

I received from my so call lawyers, Caldwell and Eddy.
(I think Carter had a lot value on lots at $14,000.00 in this report that was turn in on January 23, 1998. ?

why did not Judge Russell ask in court on March 2005 to see this report of Mac Carter.??

(But this figure is way better then what Goodwin put on Property as, Market vale of $5,300.00 for the tacking of my Property.

(Now Goodwin took two survey lots and the H.A.R. property, and put it as one parcel

he quote a market value of $5,300. on the property.

now would any person in there right mind take two survey lots and change lots to raw property, to sale on the Market.

Now at this time, Rex Tucker set up a meeting with D.O.T.

For March-15, 2000. NOW at this time Goodwin was getting a black mail contract for me to sign before he would do any more work. ?

Goodwin wanted $70,000.00 gearted in this Contract, Government delay,and deep-pocketing taitic set up in 1995.

Mr Tucker sent 377,pages of E-mail to my now x ,lawyers Caldwell & John Logan,

(john Logan get a job in the Government March of 2001 .

Eddy come on the file , first Meeting with him he call up Goodwin , now he did this after i just told him i would get a new Appraiser to do a report. ( look at April 3-2001 Fax from Babineau.)
, now after he talk to Goodwin , he said that his draif report look like a good start , for a report. ?

why did he Call Goodwin. after i told him i was done with Goodwin.
7. Now here¢s a lie on paper, because on Thursday March 1st, 2007 .
I went to the Oromocto Town Hall and retained a Drawing with a date on it. ( of February 1997) First drawing that had survey line where the highway is on my Property .
• This drawing of February 1997 was use at the Second public meetings on the alignment Issue to relocate the highway from Smith subdivision.

To where it is today. (( comcrection on this issuse of the second meeting)

There was only one meeting to the public on December 11/1996.

(the Public would only learn that the alinement was to change on this date December 11/1996, (there was no Survey drawing untill February 1997,

Before this date the alinement was in a differn location.? or was it.

( because of what went on in 1995, ? (when i had a store for sale, ?

T.R.A. food.made a verble offer to buy all my Property for $250,000.00 in 1995. ?

Did they know about the Change in highway alinement back then, if so the Government has fraud Richard Harris out of his hold life.

( who will do a investation on the injustice tactic of rule of Court deep pocketing. ?

It not like the New Brunswick Judges don't


know what is going on with these property Expropriation cases. (see canlii.org)

(look what it is costing the Public for all these bureaucracy to justicefied there Job, and look what it cost the public when these people are the ones that could make a differn in the world we live in,???

( but insted of then geting penlize, ( we will give then there retirerment,

wow what a system. ? a reward for there Snding and lieing.

( I would like a investaition on these matter. ? how to hold these Bureaucracy accountable for there Decision, on a person life work,
That 11 year latter have no fucture left or dream to live any longer.

4. Undertaking of December 6th, 2001 said more or less the Second public meeting was on December 11th, 1996.

This was in Fact the First Meeting to the Public. The one and only Meeting.

Now on December 5th, 2001 undertaking as to pargraft two.

(Quote Attached is a copy of the plan (the Drawing with a date of 12/96) plan used at the December (11) 1996
Public Meeting showing the new or perpose Highway alignment.

(Now this drawing is not to scale to where the highway is now)

like to the drawing of February. Dated February 1997. with survey line.

The one I got a copy of Fred Hackett on March 1st, 2007.

Fact. now Heather Pugh did not have this drawing on December 17,1996. ( that for sure) Drawing date February 1997.?

when i travel to Oromocto on March 1/2007,at my own expences
I ask Fred Hackett for the Big drawing used at the plublic Meeting of december 11/1996, he told me he Could not find that one,
so i ask him ,when did the town know what the land requirement was by D.O.T. knowen to the town,
I gest this is why he gave me this drawing of February 1997.

5. Why is this so important? Because of a lie that was told in court by Heather Pugh that set the main Logistics for a decision by Judge Russell to paid me so little after 8 years of fighting?

If this memo was so important you would think it would have been brought up at one of the two Discoverys ? ?? or was Judge Russell June 3/2005 Decision made on December 17,1996,by Shelden Lee,and John Raymond. ? There is a paper trial that sure look like this in my Files,.The files that was only return to me this year in June of 2007,. this was to late to ward of 2 court sessions, one on february 12/07,the other on the Goodwin matter on February 26/07. now this month of November /07 there two more court sessions. more abuice to a person that ben deeppocketing from 1997.

why is the memo of Heather Pugh not brought up at

Discovery of 2001 or 2004 but I think why it was not is because of the Goodwin Matter (see page 90, on the Goodwin draft report. )

there 2. reports now, the first one that went to the complaint concomey of N.B.Association of Real Estate Appraisers ? Which has the power to levy fines and cost penalties. ( i received Goodwin defence on this one on Janruary of 2005, a few week before the Trial.?


now the Goodwin number 2, report that i only seen for the first time on March 3/2005. THIS report was used in his motion in court on February 26/2007, ? he was fired as far as i was comcerm on or about february 18,2000. I also received Goodwin defence on the Action i started in june 2004, is all of this just a queneses.??

so why did he do the number 2 report up. ? this report is also full of misleading fact, and ares in the figger, Not even addressing 10% of my losses on this Expropation of a person life work.







Now if this memo of Heather Pugh was to play such an important part in the Russell Decision ,.Nine years later. Then why was this document not on John S. Raymond affidavit of Documents list,

(form 31,B)Copy of this memo( SEE : Exhibit A-8 ) of Judge Russell paragraph 49 . See the Decision at Canlii.org

6. Exhibit A-8 memo. It said ? Copy of this memo went to John Raymond Assistant director, Copies to Mike Phillips,Copies to Brian McEwing and Colleen Brown.

Now with all these people having Copies,? you would think this memo that my Lawyers enter as Exhibit A-8 at trial.

you would have to think this memo would at least been on Raymond Documents list. ? why is Judge Russell letting this staking the Exhibit Documents. /? Why would he alowe this in court.(i think it got a lot to do with the Goodwin Matter, allso to do with the confick of Interence that the Frank Mckeen government set up to build this highway-for there buddy to take large amonts of Taxpayer money.

7. Questions, but look at page 90 of Goodwin report and you will see he knew of a memorandum that was faxed by Ross little, to Lonnie Forbes?

How would he know this? It looks like he talks to Lonnie forbs or Ross Little.

Now this work should be on his Detail billing.
( I will have to look for it now on March 6th, 2007)

When would I see any of the Governments Documents, two week before for Discovery of September 11th, of 2001?

On Goodwin detail invoice billing to Mr. Richard Harris. Date Entered: July 6th, 1999. On page 2. On or about March 2nd, 1999

Goodwin Quote (telephone Commission with Lonnie Forbes, N.B. Municipalities Culture and Housing Rural Planning Commission.

Now on March 2nd, 1999.and looking at Goodwin page 90 of the draft report, he quoted (a memorandum contained a note for the potential of the proposed highway to affect the RAH/HARCL land and also noted that RAH had been to the NBDOT Planning Office to see the plans for the new highway. ?? (why have he not got the time of this Meeting to see Plans.)
/
!!!!! fact there was no survey drawing of alinement untill late february 1997. Now this is a fact. after i talk to the Town of Oromocto develment offier Mr.Fred Hackett.

If Mr. Goodwin was looking out for my best interest in his report? ( you would think he would be putting a date on this so call meeting at NBDOT planning Office of me seeing the Plans of the new Highway,)?

So on or about March 19th, 1999. Goodwin was at my place getting eight Thousand more dollars from me, leading me on that his report was just about finished. It was worth around 4-to-6 hundred thousand, But Obviously he knew what was to take place in March of 2005 in Court. (The key to this whole matter is this none dated Drawing that Goodwin refureds to on his page 90 in his report.

(Goodwin quotes) February 3rd, 1997, a memorandum was faxed by Ross Little, of NBDOT land Management & planning to Mr. Lonnie Forbes, Development Officer for the Rural Planning District Commission concerning the Richard Harris property and enclosing plan #82? Now how would I know what plan #82 was, if I did not see this untill March of 2005 in Court


what even more inporten is Exhibit R-16 Internal Governmemt property Listing . If Judge Russell look at this List closely ? he would of notice the Nane of Gary Straition and Carolyn Straition ? now you can find this same sale in Fredericton Appraisal Associates ltd. Malcolm J. Carter, AACI, FRI, CMR> a report Prepared for Mr. Donald J. Mc Crea ; Deputy Minister of Transportation (file No 71-H-6007 ) See page 31-INDEX #NO. 4 Date of sale August 10,1995. now letts look at page 16 pargrafh 44, and 45,of Judge David H Russell Decision of June 3 2005 , Now what i see here is the Straition are the the Same people that had a Real Estate Agemet came and made me a offer on one of my lots in fall of 1994, now this is after i told this Real Estate compety not to bother me with any offer less then $15,000.00 all of my Property was on a listing at this time , store and lot at $230,000.00 Two Legal size building lots for $15,900.00 each and the back property for $33,000.00 remenber the Street work was just started at this time.
Lot 92-2 needed about 12 feet of fill . but the Straition did make a Arms lengh offer of $11,500.00 on this lot. IN 1995 i fill this lot with over $15,000.00 worth of fill, The Straition made the offer on lot 92-1-a corner lot that would only requires about $3,000.in fill. Now why would they the Straition go down the Broad rd. and buy a lot that would requires at less $30,000.00 in fill. what even more funny with this lot that they bought from Bill Jones for $10,000.00 .It is steel setting there the same way. ? did they get wind of the Change in highway alinements in 1994.

Bill Jones had a lot right beside this one for sale allready fill for $16,000.00 so why did they not buy this lot insted of the large hole they bought,??
or why did they not paid Richard Harris the $15,500.00 that i would of tacken for this lot 92-1 in 1994, ??

I think they bought this lot because they though the highway would be There.

Fact: Carolyn Straition run a chiropractic business in Haney Town.
Carolyn Straition bought a property for her Business in 1997 beside the town of Oromocto town line. ?

So why was the Straition trying to buy a lot from Richard Harris in 1994. ??? Why did Carter have this Comparables lot in his Report. Mac Carter knew i Richard Harris would not take $11,500. hunder in 1994.

So he turn around after the Government, i gest told hin i was Changing Lawyer from Allen Miles to Mr. Douglas Caldwell , so this is why he use this lot.
Now if i would take $11,500 dollars in 1994 . He knew this so why would he only put a ten thousand on lot 92-1 ,. Carter knew that Stephen Leblanc offer $15,000. for this same lot on february 12 /1997. The Government paid this Appraiser over twenty five hundred dollars to justified a ten thousand dollars cheque on this one lot 92-1 . the question i have here is why so much money to apprais on a empenty lot .

Most of the plublic know you can get a appraisal on a house and lot for about five Hunder dollars , the value for a Bank lone of $150,thousand Dollars.

Now back to the Exhibit A-8 the memo that appeared in Court and entered by my lawyers, the Drawing that went with it has no dates and no official writings or notes to make it a legal document other than stating it was plan #82 ( but this Drawing has survey line of the highway alinement)

My point here is what date and Year was this SURVEY carry out. The Taxpayer paid for this survey work on the highway, so why after wasting month trying to get the Survey date. I can't get it unless i take court action.

Is if because it will prove Heather Pugh lie on the Stand in Court.
Is Perjury not against the law, is Shawn Graham ,T.J.Burke and Denis Landry not up holding Perjury by there Bureaucrats, these Bureaucrats will be rewarded at the End, buy the Taxpayers, to compleaty destroy a human being. I am 55 now in pore health, no way to start over.



8. Now look at paragraph #6 and you will see that there were copies of Heather Pughs Memo sent to Ross Little.

• Facts there were no Drawings showing my 18 building lots sent to DOT, planning Office untill January 1997 .
• We know that the Town of Oromocto did not get a Survey drawing untill February of 1997 to have the Second public Meeting. Because the first was on December 11th, 1996. And six days later on the same day that I know now my wife Marilyn Harris signed for a Notice of intent to survey letter.
• Heather Pugh Memo said I seen her on December 17th, 1996. This is false!
• I will admit I did go to see Heather Pugh with a drawing that I received from Lonnie Forbes only after the meeting on February 12, 1997 with Stephen Leblanc. I was also at a meeting with John Raymond and Loraine Obraen earlyer that day . (the Quesion i have here is if there was a sket drawing at the plublic meeting on December 11 /1996 why did not one of the three people above give me a copy . Why did'nt Stephen Leblanc have a Drawing with him on February 12/1997.

There is something very roung here. ( i bleave this is desect, bad faith)



• The drawing with a date on it of 12/96. On this drawing I drew a red line to show DOT people buy taking all my property they would not need to move the salt and sand storage building. I think I knew for sure on February 15th, 1997 that they D.O.T.did not have any survey work started yet. on the Change of the alinement, (i belived the Government was going to give one of the Done Storage building to MRDC. untill i show then how they could take all my property and would not have to move the Storage Building.

I think this made then mad at me. ( a half a million of Taxpayer copper)
• On or about March 2th,2007 At 9:30.am I traveled to the Burton Court House, looking for this plan #82,filed (not in the Court) but what I did learn was the date of Survey ,1997/ 03 /07 ,I think this would be March ,7,1997. But what I know from the Town Hall in Oromocto that there was drawing with a date February 1997 that the town had.
• This brings us to a question when for the first time could these Center Lines be put on this none dated Drawing? Because these Lines are the location where the Highway is today.
• So with the matter of a so call meeting on December 17th, 1996 with Heather Pugh. This meeting would have been impossible.

9. Now on Paragraph [51] of Judge David Russells decision, who would these accusations benefit the most?

I think it would be Goodwin as he obviously knew what was to take place in Court 2005 as it looked on page 90 of the Draft report that I would see for the first time in July of 1999.

10. Why did Goodwin not have the fact that Lonnie Forbes sent D.O.T. a drawing showing my 18 building lots??

Why did he leave this information out on page 90 of his background part of the first draft report?

(Is this not evidence that D.O.T .knew my intention for my property. Janruary of 1997)


Look what I was doing March 13th, 2005 on this matter of a meeting on December 17th, 1996?

Going to the Oromocto postal outlet to find out what day this Intent to Survey letter was sign for?

Why did Mr. Caldwell not enter the whole 4 pages of Documents I gave him?

I think this has a lot to do with Goodwin also. In March of 2005? I gave Douglas Caldwell a 2 page of my opinion on the so-call meeting with Heather Pugh.

Today is august 1/2007 and I know for sure that I did not meet with Heather Pugh untill I got the drawing from Lonnie Forbes, (now I never seen any drawing untill after February 12/1997?

________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
.