ALL WORKING AS ONE

Sent : February 17, 2007 6:37:36 PM To : injusticecoalition@hotmail.com Dear Mr. David Eidt,Esq. On February 12, 2007 when we were in Court on the matter of the Appeal on court file, NO; F/C/328/00 I showed you a letter that was sent to me, from the Law Society of New Brunswick. The letter was to Jamie Eddy, from Robert Pineo, where he is updating him on my expropriation case (No; F/C/328/00). I do not believe they are respecting me on the Goodwin matter, am I incorrect? Now there a motion on this file number F/C/187/04 set to be heard on February 26/07? I should have had my files back by the time that decision was made. Is it only due to circumstances beyond my control that there was a Status hearing on February 12/07 and now there a motion hearing set for the 26/07 as well? So I am presuming that Jamie Eddy is, or was, my New Brunswick Lawyer. If Robert Pineo is sending out letters regarding my affairs to Mr. Eddy then I presume that to be correct. On August 29, 2005, I took a heart attack and ended up having heart surgery and was therefore under doctor’s orders to not do any thing physically or emotionally straining or stressful until the end of December of 2005. I was also scheduled to move in December of 2005, as I had informed my room house land lord. I had planned to move out west before I took the heart attack, to be closer to my daughter Aimee and my granddaughter. I had no intention of taking the amount of money Judge Russell Decision on June 3, 2005 until I found out what I would be getting back on my costs and out of pocket expenses. By this time in November of 2005, I was being forced to change my mind do to the stress of Surgery with no driver license and my land lady all ready had my room rented out for the month of December to a person that would be there for two years .I was now being forced to try to get the money, I was very distress and unhappy that under the circumstances I found my self in that I would have to seek money from Russell Decision. Now in order to get payment from the Lawyers, they were telling me that I would have to signs paper for then to give to the Government before they would send the money from N.S. At first they sent out the paper an advice me to sign and return then to there Office in N.S., before I would see the Cheque. I inform then that I would not be signing any paper for then on less the money was to be release to me the same time. This took about two weeks to come about. (I did not think they would give up the Money.) On or about November 2/05 my NB lawyer Jamie Eddy had a call put to me telling me that they have a Cheque for us my son and my self. On or about November 4, 2005 we would go to the Fredericton office of Patterson Palmer Law office for a meeting with Jamie C. Eddy. Now at this Meeting Mr. Eddy had us to sign Affidavit of Execution of Release of funds. See 9 pages of Attachment: Now there was also a letter to your Attention: Mr. David Eidt that was already in advance of our Meeting with Mr. Eddy, as you can see by the letter head on this Letter to you the law Firm that represents us was Patterson Palmer law, and the lawyer in NB was at this time, was Jamie Eddy, that would have us sign these paper of Release. (It was Not Douglas Caldwell or Robert Pineo.) This brings us to the Question if they had no intention to put in Documents of Cost for Payment of Costs and Disbursements, to be assessed by the court if necessary. Then my files should of have been return on this day of November 4 by Mr. Eddy. Now there the matter of the appeal .Now Mr. Eddy being our N.B. lawyer knows if his Clint, in the case of Richard A. Harris ,the results of the appeal initiated by him in the Court of Appeal. (He would need his files as quickly as possible) On or about September 14, 2006, I made a request to Patterson Palmer Hunt Murphy Or Patterson Palmer Law, Firm. Requesting my total files as to the letter to Jamie Eddy ( see letters to Caldwell of 2005 and 2006 ) See Attachment of nine pages of release Document of November 4/05 See Attachment of Letter. September 14, 2007. Robert Pineo is talking about two Issues in this Email letter to Jamie C. Eddy. The first Issue is the Taxation of there bill of Costs only. I have you to know That I don’t except this as being Legal, as you are well aware that I am, entitled as being the owner ‘’ costs’’ as well. I will need at least three month to do this taste once I have my file return to my self. Robert Pineo not only provided a bill of costs ,he also provided you Mr.Eidt a Affidavit in March on 2006 that I was not aware of, on till I received this letter from the Law Society. He is saying this is his Affidavit, is it not a law under the Expropriation Act (o.c.84-46) accordingly to this case . Now Mr.Eidt I have informed you a number of times about this there were all most the same circumstances going on, the different is in Court the Government knew that there side, and did not have any Appraisal reports, with Mr. Carter as there appraisal But what became more importance at this time is the Goodwin Matter of the up coming motion set for February 26,2007 that Robert Pineo not only provided a bill of costs ,he also provided you Mr.Eidt a Affidavit in March on 2006,that I was not aware of, on till I received this latter from the Law Society. Now you said to me in Court on February, 12, 2007 that you would give me a copy of this Affidavit. I would like a copy before February 22, 2007 as more then likely I will need it on this Motion of the 26, day of February. I would like to bring this to your attention that the Goodwin Action would have not come to be if I was not in this land disputed. Now at Discovery of September 11, 2001 Mr. Caldwell said he would be Entering the Goodwin Bill to the Government as well. I don’t be lived this has been done. So I will be entering his costs along with mine as soon as I get my file back. Pushed all the rest of my never ending costs that go on daily. Do to all matter of the loss of my self Employments. This loss started on or about February 12, 1997. As of to day February, 15, /07 this is over 10 years of out right delved abuse to a person. This time faring of Delay is Abuse in it self. Robert Pineo said in this Attachment Email of October 25, 2006 that I presume him talking about you? Counsel has agreed not to pursue the taxation until such time as the Court delivers its decisions on four pending taxations. Am I aloud to know who these people are, as it looks like they also had difficulty? Now Mr. Pineo go on to say that one of these cases is factually similar to the Harris case, and on a Decision to act as Precedent. Well I hope that there were no Successful Negotiations on there bill yet, as I have not even got my files back. I think fore sure I would have the Right to know who this person is, that you know my ex lawyers are justifying there $212,359.86 bill of Costs on this File. Mr. Pineo said the Second Issue is the return of the file to Mr. Harris. Here a Question that I would like you to answer why is he tacking on an undertaken to Vet my File before returning it to the Client or to my self. Do you not know that there are soon tings rung here? Well on the 26, day of February 2007 Robert Pineo now has been at vetting my Files for over four Months now. Maybe this got a loot to do with the Goodwin matter that flowed from these four parcels of property expropriated ion that three parcels, there would not even be mark able in size and shapes. Now Mr.Eidt on _______________________________